Philosophy Department Continuing Review Home Page

Background Information

• The Provost's page - Annual Performance Review and Post-tenure Review
• The AAUP report - On Post-Tenure Review
• The AAUP statement on Academic Freedom - 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure With 1970 Interpretive Comments
• The example from the Provost that we used as a starting point - A Department in Science and Engineering Annual Performance Review: Processes, Criteria, and Measures
• ABOR and UHAP- In general, the annual performance review is covered by the ABOR Policy Manual Section 6-211 and by UHAP Section 3.10.01 through 3.10.03. Promotion and tenure processes are described in UHAP 3.12, and post-tenure processes in UHAP 3.10.04 through 3.10.06.

• Procedures for Continuing Review, University of Arizona, approved by the Faculty Senate on October 14, 1996
• Memorandum of 5/23/97 from the Chair of the Philosophy Department to Dean Holly Smith Regarding Philosophy Department Procedures for Continuing Review
• Philosophy Department Procedures for Re-appointment
• Philosophy Department Policy Concerning Promotion to Tenure
• Philosophy Department Criteria for Promotion to Full Professor
• Philosophy Department Policy on Initiation of Professional Status Reviews
• Philosophy Department Faculty Evaluation Criteria (superseded by the present document)
• Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Model for Implementation of Streamlined Promotion and Tenure/ Continuing Status Review Process, approved by the Faculty Senate
• SBS College Conduct of Progress Toward P&T/CS Assessments in the Annual Performance Review, dated 11 August 2003