IRLS 588-003: Issues in Information Resources: Collaborative Information Retrieval

 (SUBJECT TO CHANGE)

Instructors

Dr. Xiaolong (Luke) Zhang

RM 6, SIRLS

(520)621-5219

xiaolong at u dot arizona dot edu

Office hours: Tuesday 11:00am-12:00pm or by appointment

 

Time & Place

Thursday, 3:30pm - 6:00pm, Chavez 307

 

Introduction

This course focuses on the issues concerning information retrieval in collaborative settings. The purpose of this course is to help students understand what cognitive, behavior, and social factors are involved collaborative information retrieval and how technologies can benefit people in CIR. Note that this course is a working seminar, devoted not only to learning existing theories, but also to developing theories and ideas of our own for current issues in CIR research.

 

This seminar-style course starts with the hypothesis that supporting CIR requires a good understanding of theories in information retrieval, collaborative technologies, cognitive psychology, and human-computer interaction. The first set of readings, which cover such issues as information seeking behaviors, computer-supported cooperative work, distributed cognition, information visualization, and so on, helps to build a comprehensive framework for the understanding of CIR. The second set of readings discuss CIR in various social systems. It is expected that after this course, students will be able to identify research issues in CIR as well as to provide theoretical guidance to the design of CIR systems.

 

This course is open to both doctoral students and master students.

 

Readings

Most of readings will be available in the course web site. Some readings will be distributed in the class.

 

Class Format

The class will meet once a week for two and half hours. Most classes will be a mix of lecture and in-class discussion. Each week, we will have two students to lead the discussions.

 

Assignment, Project, and Term Paper

Each week, students will be required to write a two-page reaction paper each week. Totally 10 reaction papers are required. Reaction papers should be submitted before the class, online or in paper.

 

Doctoral students are required to write a term paper. This paper should address a specific theoretical issue in CIR with an in-depth literature review, a research design, an evaluation plan, and future work. The paper should be 15-20 pages. 

 

For master students, the final paper could be either a research paper similar what doctoral students do or a final project with one other person or two. If the project is chosen, the paper should be 20-25 pages, on a relevant CIR subject, such as applying concepts discussed in class to a practical system, evaluating a practical system, designing a new system to support a particular CIR activity, etc. The project should include a literature review, the work you have done, preliminary or expected results, and future plans.

 

There are three milestones for the paper/project in Week 4, Week 7, and Week 10. The final paper is due one week after the last class.

 

Grades

Reaction papers       50% (5% each)

Final paper                50%

 

A=90-100

B=80-89

C=70-79

D=60-69

F=59 and below


 

Schedules (Readings are available in WebCT.)

 

Week

Topic

Readings

Due

1 (08/26)

Overview
 

·      Karamuftuoglu (1998). Collaborative information retrieval: toward a social informatics view of IR interaction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science archive, Vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 1070 ¨C 1080.

·      Fidel, R., Harry, B., Pejtersen, A. M., Dumais, S., Grudin, J. & Poltrock, S. (2000). Collaborative information retrieval (CIR). The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 1, pp. 235-247.

·      Twidale, M. B., Nichols, D. M., & Paice, C. D. (1997). Browsing is a collaborative process. Information Processing & Management, 33(6), pp. 761-783.

 

2 (09/02)

Information Retrieval (1)

·      Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human Information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), pp. 49-56.

·      Dervin, B. & Nilan, M. (1986). Information needs and uses. In M. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, pp. 3-33.

·      Kuhlthau, C.C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, pp. 361-371.

·      Belkin, N. J., Oddy, R. M., & Brooks, H. M. (1982). ASK for information retrieval: Part I. background and theory. Journal of Documentation, 38(2), pp. 61-71.

Reaction paper

3 (09/09)

Information Retrieval (2)

·      Bates, M. J. (1989). The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for online search interface. Online Review, 13, pp. 407-424.

·      Saracevic, T. (1997). The stratified model of information retrieval interaction: Extension and applications. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 34, pp. 313-327.

·      Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction. Elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, 52, (1), pp. 3-50.

·      Dervin, B. (1983). An overview of sense-making research: concepts, methods and results to date. International Communications Association Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas

Reaction paper

4 (09/16)

Collaboration (1)

·      Olson, G., & Olson, J. (2002). Groupware and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications, pp. 583 ¨C 595.

·      Olson, G.M., & Olson, J.S. (2000) Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, pp. 139-179.

·      Grudin, J., & Palen, L. (1995). Why groupware succeeds: discretion or mandate? Proceedings of ECSCW '95.

·      Turoff, M., Hiltz, S. R., Fjermestad, J., Bieber, M., & Whitworth, B., (2001). Computer Mediated Communications for Group Support: Past and Future, in Carroll, J. (Ed.) Human Computer Interaction in the New Millennium. ACM Press and Addison-Wesley.

Reaction paper

 

Project/paper proposal

5 (09/23)

Collaboration (2)

·      Dix A.J. (1994), Computer-supported cooperative work - a framework, in D. Rosenburg & C. Hutchison (eds.), Design Issues in CSCW, Springer Verlag, pp. 9-26.

·      Dourish, P. & Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces. Proceedings of ACM CSCW'92, pp. 107-11.

·      Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. Resnick, J. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley (Eds.) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, DC: APA. pp. 127-149.

·      Monk, A. (2003). Common Ground in Electronically Mediated Communication: Clark's Theory of Language use. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.) HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks: Towards a Multidisiplinary Science. San Francisco: Mogan Kaufmann, 2003, pp. 265-289.

·      Chen, H., Titkova, O., Orwig, R., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1998). Information Visualization for Collaborative Computing, IEEE Computer, Volume 31, Number 8, pp. 75-82.

·      Wulf, V. (1997). Storing and Retrieving Documents in a Shared Workspace: Experiences from the Political Administration. Proceedings of the Sixth IFIP Confrence on Human Computer Interaction

Reaction paper

6 (09/30)

Distributed Cognition and External Representation
 

·      Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds, Cognitive Science, 19, pp. 265-288.

·      Scaife, M. & Rogers, Y. (1996). External Cognition: how do Graphical Representations Work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, pp. 185-213.

·      Zhang, J. & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, pp. 87-122.

·      Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Chapter I: Information Visualization in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. San Francisco, California: Morgan-Kaufmann, pp. 1-34.

Reaction paper

 

 

7 (10/07)

Interaction Issues

 

·      Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Gomez, L.M., & Dumais, S. T., The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 30 (11), Nov 1987, pp. 964-971.

·      Hearst, M. (1999). User Interfaces and Visualization, in  Baeza-Yates, R. & Ribeiro-Neto, B. (eds.) Modern Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Company. Chapter 10.

·      Russell, D., Stefik, M., Pirolli, P., Card, S. (1993). Cost structure of sensemaking. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - INTERACT '93 and CHI '93. Amsterdam, pp. 269-276.

·      Twidale, M. B., & Nichols, D. (1998). Designing Interfaces to Support Collaboration in Information Retrieval. Interacting with Computers, 10, pp. 177-193.

Reaction paper

 

Project progress report

Paper milestone: literature review

8 (10/14)

Social Navigation

 

·      Dieberger, A., Dourish, P., Höök, K., Resnick, P., & Wexelblat, A. (2000). Social Navigation: Techniques for Building More Usable Systems. interactions, 7, 6, pp. 36-45.

·      Riedl, M. & Amant, R. (2003). Social Navigation: Modeling, simulation, and experimentation. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS). pp. 361-368.

·      Waterworth, J. A. (1998). Spaces, Places, Landscapes and Views: experiential design of shared information spaces. Proceedings of the Workshop on Personalised and Social Navigation in Information Space pp.77-89.

·      Kurhila, J., Miettinen,  M., Nokelainen, P., & Tirri, H. (2002). Use of Social Navigation Features in Collaborative E-Learning. Proceedings of the E-Learn 2002 Conference, pp. 1738-1741.

·      Svensson, M. (1998). Social navigation

Reaction paper

9 (10/21)

CIR in Libraries: Reference services as a CIR process

 

·      Dervin, B., & Dewdney, P. (1986). Neutral Questioning: A New Approach to the Reference Interview. Reference Quarterly, 25, pp. 506-13.

·      Olszak, L. (1991). Mistakes and Failures at the Reference Desk." Reference Quarterly, 31, pp. 39-49.

·      Overmyer, E. (1995). Serving the Reference Needs of Children. Wilson Library Bulletin, 69, pp. 38-40.

·      Parus, D. (1996) The Reference Interview: Communication and the Patron. The Katharine Sharp Review, no. 2.

·      Durrance, J. C., (1995). Factors that Influence Reference Success: What Makes Questioners Willing To Return? Reference Librarian. Vol 49-50, pp. 243-65.

Reaction paper

10 (10/28)

CIR in organizations: Decision making and knowledge management

·      Romano, N. C., Roussonov, D., Nunamaker, J. F., & Chen, H. (1999). Collaborative Information Retrieval Environment: Integration of Information Retrieval with Group Support Systems, Proceedings of the 32th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-32).

·      den Herik, K. W., & Vreede, G.-J. d. (1997). GSS for cooperative policymaking: no trivial matter. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work: The Integration Challenge, pp. 148-157.

·      Ackerman, M. & McDonald, D.. (1996). Answer garden 2: merging organizational memory with collaborative help. Proceedings of ACM CSCW '96 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

·      Choo, C. W. (1995). Information Management for the Intelligent Organization: Roles and Implications for the Information Professions. 1995 Digital Libraries Conference.

·      Cohen, A. L., Maglio, P. P., & Barrett, R. (1998). The Expertise Browser: How to Leverage Distributed Organizational Knowledge. Proceedings of ACM CSCW98.

·      Ehrlich, K., & Cash, D. (1994). Turning Information Into Knowledge: Information Finding as a Collaborative Activity. Digital Libraries '94.

Reaction paper

Project progress report

Paper milestone: Methodology

11 (11/04)

CIR in communities: knowledge and expertise sharing

 

·      Hooff, B.J. van den, Elving, W.J.L., Meeuwsen, J.M. & Dumoulin, C.M. (2003). Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge Communities. In Huysman, M.H., Wulf, V. & Wenger, E. (eds.) Communities and Technologies. Deventer: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

·      Ackerman, M. S., Swenson, A., Cotterill, S., & DeMaagd, K. (2003) I-DIAG: From Community Discussion to Knowledge Distillation. In Huysman, M.H., Wulf, V. & Wenger, E. (eds.) Communities and Technologies. Deventer: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

·      Ruuska, I. & Vartiainen, M. (2003). Communities and other Social Structures for Knowledge Sharing. A Case Study in an Internet Consultancy Company. In Huysman, M.H., Wulf, V. & Wenger, E. (eds.) Communities and Technologies. Deventer: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

·      Bandini, S., Colombo, E., Colombo, G., Sartori, F., & Simone, C. (2003). The role of knowledge artifacts in innovation management: the case of a Chemical Compound CoP, In Huysman, M.H., Wulf, V. & Wenger, E. (eds.) Communities and Technologies. Deventer: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Reaction paper

12 (11/11)

 

CIR for consumers: collaborative filtering and recommendation

·      Hill, W., Stead, L., Rosenstein, M. & Furnas, G. (1995). Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI '95 Conference, pp. 194-201.

·      Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P. & Riedl, J. (1994). GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews. In Proceedings of the ACM CSCW '94, pp. 175-186.

·      Balabanovic, M., & Shoham, Y. (1997). Fab: Content-Based, Collaborative Recommendation. Commun. ACM, 40(3), pp. 66-72.

·      Kautz, H., Selman, B., & Shah, M. (1997). Combining social networks and collaborative filtering. Commun. ACM 40, 3 (Mar. 1997)

·      Terveen, L., & Hill, W. (2001). Beyond Recommender Systems: Helping People Help Each Other, in HCI In The New Millennium

·      Walkerdine, J. & Rodden, T. (2001). Sharing Searches: Developing Open Support for Collaborative Searching Walkerdine, Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction (Interact '01), pp.140-147.

Reaction paper

13 (11/18)

 

No Class: Paper writing

 

 

14 (12/02)

 

Discussion of project and term paper

 

Project report/Term paper: problem definition, literature review, methodology and evaluation plan (one week after)